Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
+1 to this question |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi Oleg,
Hope you are doing great!
I have been subscribed to VectorBT Pro on a monthly basis since 2022.
I am a student. You mentioned that you will grant lifetime access once I
finish my $500 payment.
Can you please check and see if you can grant me lifetime access?
Much appreciate your gesture!
Thanks,
Ranjith
…On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 11:42 AM Oleg Polakow ***@***.***> wrote:
vbt won't postpone order execution to the next bar, it executes what is
being fed. That is, if you issued a signal at the very first bar and
specified the close price (default), it will execute the signal
immediately. It also doesn't know whether this signal uses the full candle
or it's based on open/previous close, all it receives is a signal and a
price. If you want it to be logically at 1 and 3, you should forward shift
your signal arrays (given you're using from_signals).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#499 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A3IU7KDA356A2BFZALXT2I3WCMGY7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQP7NFSU>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Consider this synthetic case, where candle 0 has a long entry signal and candle 2 has a short entry signal.
Can someone please clarify, if entry candle is a candle with the signal, or a next candle? Logically thinking, entry candles should be 1 and 3, because we can create entry signal when candles 0 and 2 are fully formed and thus entry on those candles is no longer possible. Plotting is confusing though.. In case signal candle is entry candle, maybe i have to shift my signals forward myself?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions