Provide submission/book DOI/URN via OMP OAI

[bozana]

In OMP an OAI record is per publication format. We only consider publication format DOIs there. However, mostly users will assign the DOIs to submissions and not to publication formats (this is also what we recommend for Crossref export). We also provide the submission/book view URL.
Thus, consider submission/book DOIs in OMP OAI record if there is no publication format DOI found.

s. https://forum.pkp.sfu.ca/t/omp-doi-missing-in-oai-dc/14778/19

PRs:
stable-3_3_0: pkp/omp#1618
stable-3_4_0: pkp/omp#1619
main: pkp/omp#1620

• main: Update Dc11SchemaPublicationFormatAdapter.php omp#1629, pkp/pkp-lib#9877 Provide book DOI and URN via OMP OAI omp#1637
• stable-3_4_0: pkp/pkp-lib#9877 Provide book DOI and URN via OMP OAI omp#1636
• stabl-3_3_0: pkp/pkp-lib#9877 Provide book DOI and URN via OMP OAI omp#1638

[bozana]

@ewhanson, could you please review the PRs above?
Thanks a lot!

[asmecher]

@bozana / @ewhanson, I've just noticed that this is a duplicate of this forum thread and the linked PR, which is merged. I do think that just adding the book identifier to the record risks breaking the spec, as it's not guaranteed to be a unique identifier, so I favour the approach in the linked thread. What do you two think?

[bozana]

Yes, I think we can leave it as dc:relation.
(Just a note: Crossref for example only suggests to have DOIs on book and chapter level, so once we implement Crossref deposit in OMP, it will only be possible to assign DOIs to book and chapters (if using Crossref). -- Similar to article and galley in OJS.).

[bozana]

Maybe we can just back port it to stable-3_4_0 and stable-3_3_0?

[bozana]

I have backported it to stable-3_4_0 and stable-3_3_0 and considered URN i.e. other pubIds in the same way... When the tests pass I will merge...