We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IIUC from Pablo, it is more correct to create the object to pass as pointer to FFI in this way:
BUT, saving in some global way e.g. FFIExternalValueHolder ofType: 'void*'. The class FT2Types would be an example.
FFIExternalValueHolder ofType: 'void*'
FT2Types
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe LGitWriteBackValueInt is good as example, too.
LGitWriteBackValueInt
Sorry, something went wrong.
Note: The diff above implies this other change in the FFI signature:
No branches or pull requests
IIUC from Pablo, it is more correct to create the object to pass as pointer to FFI in this way:
BUT, saving in some global way e.g.
FFIExternalValueHolder ofType: 'void*'
.The class
FT2Types
would be an example.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: