You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For BASE to be abnormal we compare it with the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) ANRHI, i.e. BASE > ANRHI
I encountered a situation where ANRHI differs within a subject and lab test due to data from different lab vendors. Should we consider changing the use of ANRHI to BNRIND when determining whether the baseline is normal/abnormal?
Some CTCAE grade definitions contain two sets of units, but only one is provided in the current grading metadata. For example, TERM=Hypoalbuminemia has only one row for unit = g/L, so it's not be able to grade for unit = g/dL
can we add more rows to the metadata to cover different units?
Grading Criteria Metadata NCI-CTCAEv5
From lab_grading/assumptions-made-when-grading:
Some CTCAE grade definitions contain two sets of units, but only one is provided in the current grading metadata. For example,
TERM=Hypoalbuminemia
has only one row forunit = g/L
, so it's not be able to grade forunit = g/dL
can we add more rows to the metadata to cover different units?
Originally posted by @kaz462 in #2191 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: