You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using PeerJS server v1.0.0 and see in the source code that the checkBrokenConnections module runs a timer at 300ms interval which checks for a timeout for all connected clients.
This timeout is by default 60000ms. So I am asking why is it necessary to check for broken connections every 300ms?
I think reducing this to the ping default value of 5000ms would decrease CPU impact significantly and it would catch a client timeout maximum 5 seconds later (worst case) which does make no big difference in my opinion (max. of ~65s timeout instead of ~60.3s timeout).
Or am I missing something here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am using PeerJS server v1.0.0 and see in the source code that the
checkBrokenConnections
module runs a timer at 300ms interval which checks for a timeout for all connected clients.This timeout is by default 60000ms. So I am asking why is it necessary to check for broken connections every 300ms?
I think reducing this to the ping default value of 5000ms would decrease CPU impact significantly and it would catch a client timeout maximum 5 seconds later (worst case) which does make no big difference in my opinion (max. of ~65s timeout instead of ~60.3s timeout).
Or am I missing something here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: