-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aggregated views #196
Comments
Details on the point that "it's hard to navigate the output": I need to fill in all three boxes (forge, namespace, repo name). I'd be great if I can filter the repos by typing into any one of the three boxes. The "PRs Handled" prints the latest 10 PRs. If I want information on an old PR, let's say #300 when the latest is #686, I need to click the "Load More" button many many times. I propose adding a box for filtering the listed PRs. Clicking the "Load More" button I mention above has no feedback on whether it is doing something after clicking. Currently nothing happens after clicking it for ~10 seconds and then another 10 PRs are loaded. I propose adding some kind of spinning wheel to indicate that more PRs are being loaded. The listed test runs under a PR provide no information when they were executed or what git commit they were run for. If the test suite is executed 2+ times on a PR, then I have no way of knowing what's the last test executed. I propose adding at least a timestamp and sort the listed test entries based on the timestamp. |
As far as this is concerned we need to implement a search within the server itself that we can query instead of having to input everything ourselves. @TomasTomecek do we have an issue created for this in the packit repo? I know I added one for filtering but don't think I created one for the searching. Once that is up I should be able to tackle this one fairly easily |
@SpyTec not aware of one for searching: maybe we could combine that into one request: one endpoint that can both search and filter (to me, they sound like the same thing) |
In the brainstorming session earlier this month we agreed on several changes for
This will firstly require having more efficient DB and API (ideally pipeline-centric): related to packit/packit-service#1848. |
After a team discussion, we didn't pick this as a top Packit team priority for the next quarter and preferred epics with bigger user benefits. (Sadly, we have limited resources...) If anyone (not only @SpyTec ) wants to help us with this, we will be really glad. We are open to any collaboration and have successfully implemented/started multiple affords thanks to people outside of the Packit team. |
This is an epic where we'd provide views for
we already have something but it's hard to navigate the output
the point of this epic is
related: #130
Q1 2023 planning outcome:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: