Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to set ALL folders to a desired sorting (last edited, A-Z, ...) #21060

Open
Rowin63 opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Option to set ALL folders to a desired sorting (last edited, A-Z, ...) #21060

Rowin63 opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning

Comments

@Rowin63
Copy link

Rowin63 commented Oct 16, 2024

After a fresh install and bring back all my folders (50+) into osmand, ALL folders are set to "last edited" again, and this sorting is really annoying. So now I have to go through every single folder and set it to "A-Z" again.

A possibility to set ALL folders to a certain sorting option would be great!
Also when creating or renaming a folder its standard sorting is always this annoying "last edited".
Let the user set a standard setting please, thanks!

@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

There is an option to change recursively probably you don't need 50 top level track folders?

@vshcherb vshcherb added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label Oct 16, 2024
@Rowin63
Copy link
Author

Rowin63 commented Oct 16, 2024

There is an option to change recursively probably you don't need 50 top level track folders?

I see, there is an option "Unterordner sortieren" ("sorting subfolders") in my places´ 3dots.
I did not expect this option sorting the tracks, if it is named "sorting subfolders" ;-)

My tracks are sorted by country_year, source (different sources per country) and other options. And after travelling already for some years, 50 folders is not really much.

But you´re right, it´s a lot of folders and this was my intention for creating various sub-folders inside a country folder.
What unfortunately does not really work properly, as we know by now ;-)

@sonora
Copy link
Member

sonora commented Oct 16, 2024

I have decided to put all my own tracks in one single top folder, which makes things like this easier...

@Rowin63
Copy link
Author

Rowin63 commented Oct 16, 2024

Yes, maybe, but I don't want to leave my used "folder creating system" because "last edited" is the standard sorting type...

@sonora
Copy link
Member

sonora commented Oct 17, 2024

Yes, maybe, but I don't want to leave my used "folder creating system" because "last edited" is the standard sorting type...

In fact, for those of us having big libraries of tracks, A-Z is usually the method of choice for sorting them, becasue we would likely automatically use a file name structure fulfilling exactly our needs of structuring and locating them. "Last edited" is probably a comparable small use case, only valid for

  • recordings. If at all, our standard naming starts all recording with an ISO date so A-Z sorting is equally useful there.
  • and users creating or modifying tracks by edits. But this may often only happen in certain folders, not across the board.

So in summary, we could maybe derive a suggestion that

  • "Last edited" should at most only be the default sorting in some folders, perhaps in the system folders "rec" and "import",
  • while "A-Z" should be the default sorting for all user folders / custom folders?

@Rowin63
Copy link
Author

Rowin63 commented Oct 17, 2024

Thats exactly how I use it.
"rec" and "import" are my only folders set to "recently updated". So I can see the latest/newest tracks.
Thanks for your opinion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants