Clarification of the unrelated content rule

[indus]

See: #5496 and #5698 for more context.

TLTR: Just because something is created with JS doesn't mean it qualifies for a JS.ORG subdomain. Think of an arbitrary website - chances are high that more or less JS is involved. But that doesn't mean that every website qualifies for a JS.ORG domain....
If the JS code is mostly hidden from the visitor and is just part of the product, then it is more likely that it doesn't qualify for a JS.ORG domain.
In sharp contrast, there may be cases where there is no JS involved at all and a site still effortlessly qualifies for a JS.ORG subdomain. An example would be a site for a local JS meetup that is built and managed with a static site generator.

The goal is just to put more focus on JS when handing out subdomains...

[DomeQdev]

ok

[IgorKowalczyk]

Maybe?