Proposal to refocus the language on Web, IoT and Security while remaining general-purpose #163
mcfriend99
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
I support this! I think that Blade is great for web-development, which is personally what I see myself using it for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
As |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
TL;DR
I'm raising a proposal to refocus Blade language and its continued development on built-in support and focus on Web, IoT and secure application development without needing to install any third-party package and without losing it's ability for general-purpose development.
Content
After multiple considerations, I begin to feel that while being a general-purpose language, Blade will benefit a lot more from crafting a niche for itself as a general-purpose batteries-included language with a focus on Web, IoT and secure application development where third-party packages are completely optional.
In order to achieve this, Blade will need to begin to provide tooling to support this goals. This will include at a bare minimum the following tools:
http
module with support for UDP).http
module.Just to mention a few.
Along with this proposal, I have proposed some major changes to the Blade distribution.
What does this mean for the next release.
This proposal is aimed to start taking effect at version
0.0.86
. The next release should be unaffected by this to allow more time for bug-fixes and testing for the proposed mergers.Who can vote?
Everybody.
How to Vote
To vote on this proposal, kindly drop a comment or a like.
❤️🔥 @mcfriend99
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions