Confusion about the interpolation from a small supercell to a denser q-mesh. #346
-
Dear SSCHA developers, I noticed that the link https://github.com/orgs/SSCHAcode/discussions/172 says we can extend the SSCHA minimisation of small supercell to a larger one. Such work may obtain better data with less HPC resources. I confused about the start point (q-mesh) of harmonic calculation. I have finished the harmonic calculation with a 444 q-mesh, which shows imaginary phonon modes. I want to study the anharmonic effect on the system via SSCHA. If I use a 444 supercell, the calculations is too expensive for me. If I use a 222 q-mesh, the harmonic phonon is too bad. So I want to create a 222 supercell for SSCHA minimisation and then extend the results to 444 supercell. Should I do a harmonic calculation with a 222 q-mesh as start points as a start points for the SSCHA calculations? If not, how to start with the 444 meshed harmonic dynamical matrix to create a 222 supercell for the further SSCHA calculations? Best & Regards! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Hi, Yes, you can perform the SSCHA calculation on a 2x2x2 dynamical matrix, then try the interpolation on a 4x4x4 exploiting the Harmonic dynamical matrices computed in the 4x4x4. To this purpouse:
where Here, we are interpolating the difference between the SSCHA and the Harmonic dynamical matrix from the 2x2x2 into the 4x4x4 q-mesh, then summing this difference on the Harmonic dynamical matrix in the 4x4x4. This usually converge much faster than interpolating the SSCHA dynamical matrix, as the difference between SSCHA and Harmonic is shorter-range than the full dynamical matrix, thus converges on a smaller q-mesh. Hope this is usefull, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi,
Yes, you can perform the SSCHA calculation on a 2x2x2 dynamical matrix, then try the interpolation on a 4x4x4 exploiting the Harmonic dynamical matrices computed in the 4x4x4.
To this purpouse: