Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AAT, I'd like a webview test that asserts Display the baked content when baking completes successfully (never display raw) #147

Open
m1yag1 opened this issue Jun 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@m1yag1
Copy link

m1yag1 commented Jun 19, 2018

CASE NUM: C132546

User story

AAT, I'd like a webview test that asserts Display the baked content when baking completes successfully (never display raw)

Preconditions


Steps


Expected Result

Trello card: https://trello.com/c/AMQ77RZg/111-ctepipeline113-display-the-baked-content-when-baking-completes-successfully-never-display-raw

Acceptance criteria

If baking is successful, then you should be seeing the latest version of the content. Should not say ÒA new version is availableÓ.

When a book is published and baking fails (work with Kerwin to manually fail baking a book):

  • The online version of the book still shows the old version number
  • Links to baked pages still work
  • These pages do not contain the yellow link at the top that says ÒA new version is availableÓ
@m1yag1 m1yag1 added this to the Q2 milestone Jun 19, 2018
@Dantemss
Copy link
Member

Will need to meet with Kerwin to discuss how to automate this one.

@m1yag1 m1yag1 modified the milestones: Q2, Q3 Jun 26, 2018
@BrianYing
Copy link
Contributor

need to discuss with Ross about how to get the old version number

@kerwinso
Copy link
Contributor

I discussed this with Brian. This is a tough one to automate -- for one thing, I don't know how to manually fail baking a book (would need to discuss with Ross).

@m1yag1 m1yag1 removed this from the Q3 milestone Jul 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants