You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
C-terminus was truncated, not. central domain. check Joe's reply in #36 but does not influence the logic of the idea below
Dear team,
As the project progress, I realised one issue that cannot be properly explained at the moment and may require further investigations into: the binding mode of AZ compounds in Pae MurC ligase is so far not fully justified; they were captured to bind like what we saw in PDBs in a truncated protein and the interactions between the AZ hits and the central domain were omitted throughout the project design
Let me take AZ5595 as an example:
What we saw:
Since the central domain was truncated, we cannot justify this compound would bind this way.
If the protein was further engineered with N or C -terminus truncated (with AZ5595 soaked in the pocket), we might observe the other potent interactions (see as follows) which can still explain the nano molar potency in vitro.
What we want to see:
However, we were having difficulties in obtaining the crystal of full length Pae MurC protein (if I remember it right).
So, as a chemist I might not be able to bring in too much of an insight on how to do the protein work but I still would like to raise some shallow ideas:
if the full-length protein was stable but just could not crystallise, can we potentially use CryoEM to obtain the structure?
if the protein was unstable, can we try building up engineered Pae MurC structures with N or C terminus truncated and then soaked with AZ5595 or AZ compound 4?
After obtaining the PDB of AZ compound 4 in Pae MurD, our understanding can be further justified?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pae MurC very stable, go Xstallography
But AZ5595 (WYH25) has DMSO that subtracts water to form Ice
send AZ5595 and other compounds in solids not DMSO stocks
worst scenario go CryoEM
Laura (AZ5595 in Pae MurC) & Scott (AZ compound4/WYH9 in Pae MurD)
Alphafold3 trying to provide full-length MurC structure (inputing truncated MurC Xstallography data to locate the coordinates and sequential data to generate the truncated central domain) @Yuhang-CADD try this
Correction here
C-terminus was truncated, not. central domain. check Joe's reply in #36 but does not influence the logic of the idea below
Dear team,
As the project progress, I realised one issue that cannot be properly explained at the moment and may require further investigations into: the binding mode of AZ compounds in Pae MurC ligase is so far not fully justified; they were captured to bind like what we saw in PDBs in a truncated protein and the interactions between the AZ hits and the central domain were omitted throughout the project design
Let me take AZ5595 as an example:
What we saw:
Since the central domain was truncated, we cannot justify this compound would bind this way.
If the protein was further engineered with N or C -terminus truncated (with AZ5595 soaked in the pocket), we might observe the other potent interactions (see as follows) which can still explain the nano molar potency in vitro.
What we want to see:
However, we were having difficulties in obtaining the crystal of full length Pae MurC protein (if I remember it right).
So, as a chemist I might not be able to bring in too much of an insight on how to do the protein work but I still would like to raise some shallow ideas:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: