Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Add an integration test that runs on JDK8 #778

Closed
dblock opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #795
Closed

[FEATURE] Add an integration test that runs on JDK8 #778

dblock opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #795
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v2.9.0 v3.0.0 Issues and PRs related to version v3.0.0

Comments

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Dec 21, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Coming here via #156, in #767 we restored support for JDK8, but did not enable CI.

What solution would you like?

A workflow that exercises the client on JDK8. It could mean building on 11, but executing an integration test on a version 8 runtime.

What alternatives have you considered?

Let JDK8 support fail without notice.

Do you have any additional context?

#156 (comment)

@dblock dblock added enhancement New feature or request untriaged labels Dec 21, 2023
@dblock dblock changed the title [FEATURE] Add an integration test for JDK8 [FEATURE] Add an integration test that runs on JDK8 Dec 21, 2023
@reta reta self-assigned this Dec 21, 2023
@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Dec 21, 2023

Thanks @dblock , I will take it, have some ideas on how we could approach that

@reta reta reopened this Jan 3, 2024
@reta reta added v3.0.0 Issues and PRs related to version v3.0.0 and removed untriaged labels Jan 3, 2024
@dblock dblock removed the untriaged label Feb 5, 2024
@reta reta added the v2.9.0 label Feb 21, 2024
@reta reta closed this as completed Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v2.9.0 v3.0.0 Issues and PRs related to version v3.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants