You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
quick UI anecdote from using airlock as a user. Caveats apply: I think the UI is clear as soon as you engage brain, this is nits and/or how to spark joy type comments. Also I’m not a typical user, so my experience isn’t necessarily worth acting on!
So I just ran a job , then went to airlock to get my results, went to the workspaces page & was presented with a long list covering 3 screens. Which is sorted by org, then by archived, then workspace_name - so although I knew the name of the workspace I wanted, in the first moment of looking at the page it presented to me as “unordered”… I scrolled around for a bit, it was a bit annoying, then I used the browser’s search…
First thought - I’m probably an outlier here, how much of an outlier am I? (has anyone done the stats?) I feel like it could be more intuitive with just a small tweak, wdyt about one table with three columns, with amended sort order: archived, org, workspace_name? Or two tables with two columns - table for active, table for archived, two cols org & workspace_name? when researchers in multiple orgs think of a workspace, do they think first of the org name or the workspace name?
Secondly thought was - is it the case that a lot of the use of the workspace page will be when someone’s recently run a job - could we show the timestamp of the most recent job run in that workspace? and/or sort by that timestamp?
quick UI anecdote from using airlock as a user. Caveats apply: I think the UI is clear as soon as you engage brain, this is nits and/or how to spark joy type comments. Also I’m not a typical user, so my experience isn’t necessarily worth acting on!
So I just ran a job , then went to airlock to get my results, went to the workspaces page & was presented with a long list covering 3 screens. Which is sorted by org, then by archived, then workspace_name - so although I knew the name of the workspace I wanted, in the first moment of looking at the page it presented to me as “unordered”… I scrolled around for a bit, it was a bit annoying, then I used the browser’s search…
First thought - I’m probably an outlier here, how much of an outlier am I? (has anyone done the stats?) I feel like it could be more intuitive with just a small tweak, wdyt about one table with three columns, with amended sort order: archived, org, workspace_name? Or two tables with two columns - table for active, table for archived, two cols org & workspace_name? when researchers in multiple orgs think of a workspace, do they think first of the org name or the workspace name?
Secondly thought was - is it the case that a lot of the use of the workspace page will be when someone’s recently run a job - could we show the timestamp of the most recent job run in that workspace? and/or sort by that timestamp?
https://bennettoxford.slack.com/archives/C069YDR4NCA/p1728900279209389
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: