You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been chatting with @mgrover1 about adding some support for a standard grid object into xradar. Since the Cf/Radial format is (1) easily integrable with xarray and (2) used by most radar software packages we were siding towards making the xradar grid object to be based on the Cf/Radial standard. In addition, there is some functionality in Py-ART that would make integration with packages such as PyDDA easier, namely adding in accessors that calculate point_x, point_y, point_x, point_latitutde, point_longitude, and point_altitude from gridded Cf/Radial data. Eventually, I see the goal is for PyART/PyDDA to simply use xradar Datasets for grids, so integrating the basic routines from Py-ART grids that do not involve interpolation into xradar as a priority. I will be working on this in the coming weeks.
Bobby
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have been chatting with @mgrover1 about adding some support for a standard grid object into xradar. Since the Cf/Radial format is (1) easily integrable with xarray and (2) used by most radar software packages we were siding towards making the xradar grid object to be based on the Cf/Radial standard. In addition, there is some functionality in Py-ART that would make integration with packages such as PyDDA easier, namely adding in accessors that calculate point_x, point_y, point_x, point_latitutde, point_longitude, and point_altitude from gridded Cf/Radial data. Eventually, I see the goal is for PyART/PyDDA to simply use xradar Datasets for grids, so integrating the basic routines from Py-ART grids that do not involve interpolation into xradar as a priority. I will be working on this in the coming weeks.
Bobby
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: