[PRE REVIEW]: Vectorized, Python Array API Standard Compatible Functions for Quadrature, Series Summmation, Differentiation, Optimization, and Root Finding in SciPy #7638
Labels
Comments
editorialbot
added
pre-review
Track: 7 (CSISM)
|
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: |
|
|
Software report: Commit count by author: |
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
|
License info: ✅ License found: |
|
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Python OpenTerrace: A fast, flexible and extendable Python framework for thermal energy storage packed bed simulations PyGDH: Python Grid Discretization Helper Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations Bluebonnet: Scaling solutions for production analysis from unconventional oil and gas wells |
|
👋 @mdhaber - What is the part of the SciPy codebase that you would like JOSS to review? We need to clearly identify what we want reviewers to look at. |
From #7638 (comment), the authors of Simframe: A Python Framework for Scientific Simulations might be appropriate, since those familiar with numerical methods for solving ODEs may interested in the numerical methods relevant here. Based on this query, alexhroom, hoanganhngo610, dc-luo, moerlemans, pescap, and Akaawase stood out because Python was one of only a few languages listed, but I think any reviewer who lists "numerical methods" or "numerical analysis" as a specialty and Python as a language would be a good candidate.
Sure - it looks like the comments from the submission didn't make it to this issue, so here they are:
The source code is linked from these documentation pages. Please let me know if additional information is needed, such as the locations of unit tests or the original PRs. |
|
If there are a relatively small number of PRs, or equivalent diffs, please share these as well |
|
I think there are dozens. I could try to collect them all, or I could pick out a few depending on what they'd be used for. (If it's just to assess the scope of the effort and who contributed, I think the blame would be easier to work with, and that is easily accessible from the source.) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Submitting author: @mdhaber (Matt Haberland)
Repository: https://github.com/mdhaber/scipy
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_eim
Version: 1.15.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mdhaber. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@mdhaber if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: