[PRE REVIEW]: PyHD - PyHeatDemand - Processing Tool for Heat Demand Data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @AlexanderJuestel (Alexander Jüstel)
Repository: https://github.com/AlexanderJuestel/pyhd
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.1
Editor: @timtroendle
Reviewers: @nmstreethran, @samuelduchesne
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/05971e44bad3a2bc8f0bdbebc4013515"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/05971e44bad3a2bc8f0bdbebc4013515/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/05971e44bad3a2bc8f0bdbebc4013515/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/05971e44bad3a2bc8f0bdbebc4013515)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AlexanderJuestel. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AlexanderJuestel if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (553.7 files/s, 242682.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                13              4          15643            852
Python                           4            327            373            704
reStructuredText                 7            194             97            441
Markdown                        10            130              0            421
YAML                             9             25             29            198
TeX                              1             19              0            181
TOML                             1             10              6             69
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            45            709          16148           2866
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1963

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.4569086 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4459137 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01450 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4572994 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-14-5063-2021 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109987 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117429 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- http://dx.doi.org/10.48380/dggv-j2wj-nk88 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @AlexanderJuestel, thanks for your interest in JOSS. Due to the relatively small size of your submission, the editorial board is going to review your submission to see if it meets our requirements for substantial scholarly effort. We should get back to you within a week or two.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[AlexanderJuestel]

@kyleniemeyer, thank you very much! Please let me know if I can provide any more information to the board to demonstrate the scholarly effort!
Looking forward to hearing back from you!

[AlexanderJuestel]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @AlexanderJuestel, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[AlexanderJuestel]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

Failed to parse BibTeX on value ".1016/j.rser.2020.109987" (NAME) [#<BibTeX::Bibliography data=[13]>, "@", #<BibTeX::Entry >, {:title=>["Heat demand mapping and district heating assessment in data-pour areas"], :journal=>["Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews"], :volume=>["131"], :pages=>["109987"], :year=>["2020"], :doi=>"10"}]

[AlexanderJuestel]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.4569086 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4459137 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01450 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4572994 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-14-5063-2021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109987 is OK
- 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117429 is OK
- 10.48380/dggv-j2wj-nk88 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[AlexanderJuestel]

@kyleniemeyer, just to let you know that we are currently preparing an associated scientific publication using PyHeatDemand (just making you aware of that according to https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#co-publication-of-science-methods-and-software). In particular, we are preparing a publication outlining the creation and evaluation of the heat demand for North West Europe within the Interreg Project DGE Rollout. Parts of the resulting heat demand map are already published on a webtool: https://data.geus.dk/egdi/?mapname=dgerolloutwebtool#baslay=baseMapGEUS&extent=805870,1093160,7699110,5372220&layers=dge_heat_final

[AlexanderJuestel]

Also, I implemented spatial indices with the help of the GeoPandas developers last week decreasing the computing time of the results by a factor of up to 1e6. Further, there is also some grid refinement available now, similar to a QuadTree algorithm: https://pyhd.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notebooks/14_Refining_Polygon_Mask.html

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (674.6 files/s, 305348.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           4            416            462            948
Jupyter Notebook                14              4          16284            884
reStructuredText                 7            195             98            441
Markdown                        10            130              0            426
YAML                             9             22             29            198
TeX                              1             19              0            181
TOML                             1             10              6             69
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            46            796          16879           3147
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2000

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @AlexanderJuestel, thanks for the info - we will proceed with reviewing this. Unfortunately, we don't have any editors available to handle it right now, so I have to put this on our waitlist until someone opens up.

[AlexanderJuestel]

@kyleniemeyer, thanks for the information. This will give me some time to revise things and make the upcoming review hopefully as smooth as possible! Thanks for all your efforts already!

Cheers
Alex

[AlexanderJuestel]

Hello @kyleniemeyer,

I am just wondering if you have a rough timeline when a new editor may be available for handling my submission.

Have a good pre-Christmas time.
Cheers
Alex

[AlexanderJuestel]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TESPy: Thermal Engineering Systems in Python
Submitting author: @fwitte
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @arosen93, @corentin-dev
Similarity score: 0.8217

HydroMT: Automated and reproducible model building and analysis
Submitting author: @dirkeilander
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @JannisHoch, @mcflugen, <s>@LejoFlores</s>
Similarity score: 0.8198

HRDS: A Python package for hierarchical raster datasets
Submitting author: @jhill1
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @edoddridge, @PythonCHB
Similarity score: 0.8187

EarthPy: A Python package that makes it easier to explore and plot raster and vector data using open source Python tools.
Submitting author: @lwasser
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.8171

diyepw: A Python package for Do-It-Yourself EnergyPlus weather file generation
Submitting author: @amandadsmith
Handling editor: @timtroendle (Active)
Reviewers: @samuelduchesne, @fneum
Similarity score: 0.8159

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @timtroendle as editor

Hi @timtroendle, could you take this submission?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[timtroendle]

Yes, I am happy to.

👋 @AlexanderJuestel, I am going to search for reviewers. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @timtroendle is now the editor

[timtroendle]

👋 @AdamRJensen, @sevberg & @j3r3m1, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[AlexanderJuestel]

Yes, I am happy to.

👋 @AlexanderJuestel, I am going to search for reviewers. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.

Hello @timtroendle, thank you very much for volunteering to edit our submission. Looking forward to making the package even better with the comments and suggestions of the reviewers!

[j3r3m1]

👋 @AdamRJensen, @sevberg & @j3r3m1, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Hi, Sorry cannot make it this time

[AlexanderJuestel]

@kyleniemeyer, @timtroendle just want to make you aware of a brand new publication using PyHeatDemand: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/481

[timtroendle]

👋 @samuelduchesne, @vankesteren & @nmstreethran, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[nmstreethran]

@timtroendle yes, happy to review

…

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, 08:37 Tim Tröndle, ***@***.***> wrote: 👋 @samuelduchesne <https://github.com/samuelduchesne>, @vankesteren <https://github.com/vankesteren> & @nmstreethran <https://github.com/nmstreethran>, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6041 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHOG4CUXZ3G5MMNGHSEJHH3YPYQNBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7EAYQ7KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMBTGQ4TIOJWGY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[samuelduchesne]

Sure thing!

[vankesteren]

I just accepted a (very much delayed) review for a different package at JOSS, so I'll decline this one.

[AlexanderJuestel]

@timtroendle, then we should have two reviewers with @nmstreethran and @samuelduchesne, right?

[timtroendle]

@AlexanderJuestel, yes. Thanks @nmstreethran , @samuelduchesne, @vankesteren for your quick responses.

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot add @nmstreethran as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@nmstreethran added to the reviewers list!

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot add @samuelduchesne as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@samuelduchesne added to the reviewers list!

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6275.