Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] spike : Update CVXIF instruction #2626

Open
1 task done
AyoubJalali opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

[BUG] spike : Update CVXIF instruction #2626

AyoubJalali opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@zchamski
Labels
CV32A65X Part: Embedded configuration PARAM:CVXIF CVXIF Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system

Comments

@AyoubJalali
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an existing CVA6 bug for this?

  • I have searched the existing bug issues

Bug Description

Hello, as we know the CVXIF protocol has been changed so the verification should be updated based on the new spec, also should update spike to support new custom instruction, I notice that @Gchauvon has update some instruction in spike but not all of them.
@AyoubJalali AyoubJalali added the Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system label Nov 21, 2024
@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon assigned Gchauvon and unassigned zchamski Jan 2, 2025
@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon added the CV32A65X Part: Embedded configuration label Jan 2, 2025
@zchamski
Copy link
Contributor

zchamski commented Jan 8, 2025

This is work in progress (local commits done). Due to the scope of changes it is a major update: there are new instruction formats that need to be decoded/handled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@zchamski zchamski

Labels
CV32A65X Part: Embedded configuration PARAM:CVXIF CVXIF Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@JeanRochCoulon @Gchauvon @zchamski @AyoubJalali