Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quadruplicate Links for ObservationTypes #280

Open
KathiSchleidt opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Quadruplicate Links for ObservationTypes #280

KathiSchleidt opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@KathiSchleidt
Copy link

When one look at the definition for OGC observationType, one gets a long list of both observationTypes as well as samplingFeatureTypes, whereby each concept is provided in quadruplicate!

For each entry of both observationType as well as samplingFeatureType, we have 4 base URIs. For observationType:
http://www.opengis.net/def/observationType/OGC-OM/2.0/OM_CategoryObservation
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/OM_CategoryObservation
http://www.opengis.net/def/observation-type/ogc-om/2.0/om_category-observation
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/om_category-observation

For samplingFeatureType:
http://www.opengis.net/def/samplingFeatureType/OGC-OM/2.0/SF_SpatialSamplingFeature
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/sf_spatial-sampling-feature
http://www.opengis.net/def/sampling-feature-type/ogc-om/2.0/sf_spatial-sampling-feature
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/SF_SpatialSamplingFeature

Details here

Related to #279

@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Apr 5, 2024

Thanks @KathiSchleidt .

Some of the triples appear to be from version 2.0 of O&M.

It also appears some of the URIs are simply lowercase versions of their Camel Case equivalents. Notice the sameAs relationships between them.

https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/blob/master/definitions/conceptschemes/om.ttl#L74

We will need the OMS SWG to pass a Motion stating which triples should be marked as invalid.

The SWG should then create a Pull Request listing the triples to be removed at https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/blob/master/incubation/ObservationTypes/removal_list.csv

@avillar
Copy link
Collaborator

avillar commented Apr 5, 2024

Invalid or simply deprecated/retired/superseded, and we can then both 1) hide them from the concept hierarchies, and 2) redirect their URLs to the RAINBOW views of the valid concepts.

@rob-metalinkage
Copy link
Contributor

We can also explore some widget logic to deal with this - but we need guidance from the SWG as to what the preferred form is before it can be marked as such and alternatives suppressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Evaluate and negotiate
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants