-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Driver model behaviour from ECE regulation #47
Comments
Hi, an interesting suggestion. We haven't considered that yet. The driver model would be a specific controller for the ego vehicle, which could be used instead of the ALKS function. So this is a bit of a different focus, but I can check, if maybe esmini already provides such a controller. This would improve the demonstration, if the ego vehicle isn't driven by the default controller and does not crash into the targets all the time. |
@eknabevcc |
Hi, yes for sure there is the possibility to implement it as a controller. But there is also the possibility to create such scenarios with appropriate actions for the ego vehicle, then for each scenario a second xosc would be needed with this driver model (quick and dirty solution to create such a baseline). But for sure the proper solution would be a controller. |
Good discussion. First, esmini is unfortunately lacking a longitudinal driver model/controller. However it is planned to add a simple one, probably during September (no commitment, just prognosis :)). I also like @tmIdiada's idea of implementing driver behavior by means of OSC maneuver (including relevant events with conditions and actions) put in a catalog which could be referred to in any scenario. Haven't tested it, but it seems conceptually feasible. To conclude, unfortunately no such controller in esmini yet. |
Hi,
is it on your list to implement also the driver model from ECE regulation (including the jerk times, the lateral movement possibilities until perception, perception time, risk evaluation time, ... and also the AEB as baseline with its jerk time, delay and 0.85G deceleration, ...) as baseline for the comparison of the results?
Kind regards,
Thaddäus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: