-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
subclass axiom #181
Comments
yes, this axiom is redundant (although harmless) |
and useless! It is reduced to the FOL tautology |
Further, isn't also
redundant with
? But...I can't find any axioms that define the meaning of |
@nordlow can you open a new issue about this question about PartialOrderingRelation and the redundancy you are questioning ... |
@nordlow here my opinion: PartialOrderingRelation does have its semantics defined by the axioms about Reflexive, TotalValue and Transitive. But this is different of defining what does it means subclass. Say that subclass is PartialOrderingRelation , only says how subclass propagate in the hierarchy of classes. |
Considering that I answered the question. We can close it, issue #190 further discuss the problem that opened this issue |
In Merge.kif:
During FOL transformation, the domain declarations are used to create the restriction to the axiom but the axiom itself is being defined to properly type the arguments. So the axiom can be irrelevant or there is more on the 'operational semantics' of the implicit type system of SUMO to consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: