-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HP vs MP special cases #42
Comments
If we look at the 1000 HP vs MP pairs with the greatest negative semantic similarity difference between old and new scores (i.e., those which have increased the most) and find their common UPHENO ancestors, we find 85 nodes:
Or by frequency:
So why is UPHENO:0076806 (abnormal bone of pelvic complex morphology) the common ancestor in so many newly-high-scoring pairs? Only one HP term (HP:0040069 (Abnormal lower limb bone morphology) ) connects to it directly in PHENIO, but that term is in 31 other is_a relationships in HP, so there's potential for a local neighborhood of high similarity pairs. |
This is all super useful, thank you.. Please keep more insights like this coming. |
|
Discussed 1 at the UPheno call on 11/17, requesting a new term from GO or as a back up NBO to use in a common pattern that should improve this. |
@sbello can you give more detail, I have difficulties relating your answer to this ticket here. Thank you! |
The following are all cases in which semantic similarity comparisons between HP and MP appear to be impacted by changes in Upheno (plots below):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: