You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently we did some benchmark measurements on our implementation, and I noticed that SHA-256 was in one of the top ones. We use SHA256 in, for example, HKDF (every time we derive keys), so we might want to change it to Blake3 and see what it gives. We can't expect crazy changed overall, but it is still worth considering using Blake3 since it claims to be around 15 x faster than SHA-256 (https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently we did some benchmark measurements on our implementation, and I noticed that SHA-256 was in one of the top ones. We use SHA256 in, for example, HKDF (every time we derive keys), so we might want to change it to Blake3 and see what it gives. We can't expect crazy changed overall, but it is still worth considering using Blake3 since it claims to be around 15 x faster than SHA-256 (https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: