-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] Add micro service for template registry #158
Comments
A few thoughts on this from my side:
I will create some issues so we can track progress on this more granularly. As with AVPR, a prototype can be up quite fast, but specifics (especially embedding into the current CI processes) will take time. |
Another point: i think this repo should be also renamed to |
Being able to find all templates by an author would be very nice i think!
I think i know how to do this, but i would advise against, as the STR side would use a functional navbar (their own searchbar, navigation). Other web-components do not really apply. Maybe color scheme is enough? |
I think if we want branding, we are basically talking about the navbar and footer. I am however also fine with using the OOTB style that is provided by pico.css that is used on AVPR as it is quite clean and minimal while still feeling modern (dark mode support etc) |
As a first step sure, but i think linking the info to the actual DataPLANT accounts with profile information, ORCID links etc would be even better |
I can’t follow all the details, but generally sounds like a good idea to me. I will rename this repository to swate-template-registry then. |
I guess I can't rename it :D but changing the name is fine with me, we just have to change it in the knowledge base links as well |
No worries, I can do that. As long as we do not create a new |
With the current activity on this repository it might be nice to improve the current template infrastructure. @kMutagene set up a small database with ui to registrate validation packages for ARCs. A technology we could reuse for a template registry.
In my opinion this would be a improvement, as it would improve search performance and granularity, as well as add true versioning, instead of the "please increase the version if you change something"-modus we currently employ.
What do you think about this @StellaEggels ?
To clarify this would be a low priority task for @kMutagene and me, so it would take some time and rely heavily on the fact that we do not get any more pressing matters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: