Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[User Story] Unify multiple alignment steps into a single one #510

Open
rannick opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[User Story] Unify multiple alignment steps into a single one #510

rannick opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@rannick
Copy link
Collaborator

rannick commented Nov 12, 2024

Description of feature

Need

As a USER I would like to reduce turn around times without compromising the quality of the analyses.

As a BIOINFORMATICIAN I would like avoid computational expensive steps to be unnecessarily duplicated.

Suggested approach

Unify STAR alignment steps for Arriba and STARfusion using settings that are compatible with both tools (and StringTie), and allow for the detection of fusions (including DUX4::IGH).

Suggested parameters:

STAR \
    --genomeDir GENOMEDIR \
    --readFilesIn R1.fastq.gz R2.fastq.gz \
    --runThreadN 12 \
    --outFileNamePrefix OUTFILEPREFIX. \
    --sjdbGTFfile ANNOTATION.gtf \
    --outSAMattrRGline 'ID:CASE  'SM:CASE  \
    --outReadsUnmapped None  \
    --outSAMstrandField intronMotif \
    --chimOutJunctionFormat 1 \
    --twopassMode None \
    --outFilterMultimapNmax 50 \
    --chimMultimapNmax 50 \
    --quantMode GeneCounts \
    --outSAMunmapped Within \
    --readFilesCommand zcat  \
    --alignSJstitchMismatchNmax 5 -1 5 5 \
    --outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate \
    --chimSegmentMin 10 \
    --peOverlapNbasesMin 10 \
    --alignSplicedMateMapLminOverLmate 0.5 \
    --chimJunctionOverhangMin 10 \
    --chimScoreJunctionNonGTAG 0 \
    --chimScoreDropMax 30 \
    --chimScoreSeparation 1  \
    --chimSegmentReadGapMax 3 \
    --chimOutType Junctions WithinBAM
@rannick rannick self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
@rannick
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rannick commented Nov 12, 2024

Will close this one too #493

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant