-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restructure repo #806
Comments
Theoretically no reason not to, but it would break the website rendering currently I imagine. What would the benefits be though? I don't see an issue between configs/modules having different structures because they are entirely different things |
Benefit would be it might be easier to find stuff, and see what's supported for a given HPC system. Most users have access to one or a few of the systems in this list, and they probably want to find what pipelines are supported, not the other way around, of one person looking to run one pipeline across multiple systems. I think it feels written from the perspective of pipeline developers, when in reality I think this repo is for users/admins of these systems. |
That's fair! @maxulysse whatchuthink? |
Looks neat |
How did you guess? |
Then let's wait for @mashehu to come back from baby-ing so we don't accidently break the website |
Might break some stuff.
@jfy133 anythoughts on moving to a structure similar to the modules repo?
Maybe a better example
Could nest the ampliseq one more time too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: