Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a generic pattern for including additional user data alongside curated data #72

Open
genehack opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@genehack
Copy link
Contributor

genehack commented Nov 8, 2024

Context

From the Priorities meeting "maybe work on this" section, drafted by (I believe) @trvrb :

Also relevant early step if we are doing more as “workflows-as-programs” and I think would be generally super helpful
Augur merge should make this possible, though maybe we need sequence support first?

@genehack genehack added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 8, 2024
@jameshadfield
Copy link
Member

Existing implementations (please edit the message to fill in missing parts):

ncov

(the original implementation, as far as I remember). If multiple origins are specified in the config then we combine metadata (via this script) and sequences (script). The merging behaviour is (I believe) maintained in augur merge. This functionality is mentioned in the docs although there used to be an entire page focusing on just this concept. The workflow is somewhat complicated due to the nature and history of ncov.

mpox

Additional metadata/sequences are merged via this script, keeping the same merging behaviour as ncov. Triggered if the config defines (a path to) private metadata and sequences.

metadata curation?

I presume the remit of this issue (the generic pattern) does not touch on metadata curation, but that will be an ongoing issue once data merging becomes possible. For context see nextstrain/augur#1475 or the curation we do for the INRB mpox builds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants