-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc_tags.coffee
not documented by groc
#130
Comments
Did look into the table of contents ?!? Am 15.10.2013 um 05:30 schrieb Isaac Shapira [email protected]:
|
Damned - sorry you're right. It's missing … does this one help you out: http://sjorek.github.io/groc/doc_tags.html ? Am 15.10.2013 um 05:30 schrieb Isaac Shapira [email protected]:
|
Yes! Thank you! I wanted to start using doc_tags, but had no idea Groc supported them until I came across it in source. |
Hey guys, The sections also don't seem to show up at all. Like with the @author tag generating an Authors section, and the @see tag having a Reference section etc. Am I just using the tags wrong? What is actually currently supported? |
You’re looking at the documentation of my (@sjorek) fork, which has many (and large) patches (https://github.com/sjorek/groc/compare) applied and should be considered as highly experimental … http://nevir.github.io/groc/ (@nevir & @kmdavis) is the official documentation. I guess, officially there is only very little or partially no support for most doc_tags at all. Feel free to comment on my fork or to submit pull-requests. Remember you can always run groc on its own sources to render its documentation … Cheers.
|
@mabogunje: You're right … as my documentation says: “A list of doctag-candidates” … 😏 |
It sure would be nice to learn about all the documentation tags groc supports. Too bad its undocumented. Here for example: http://nevir.github.io/groc/index.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: