Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

In lifecycle, we should avoid using setInterval as it can lead to memory leaks when reference ends up being non cleared #330

Open
TimDaub opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

In lifecycle, we should avoid using setInterval as it can lead to memory leaks when reference ends up being non cleared #330

TimDaub opened this issue Oct 23, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@TimDaub
Copy link
Collaborator

TimDaub commented Oct 23, 2022 •
edited
Loading

@TimDaub TimDaub changed the title In lifecycle, we should avoid using setInterval as it can lead to memory leaks In lifecycle, we should avoid using setInterval as it can lead to memory leaks when reference ends up being non cleared Oct 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@TimDaub