-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Query for specific ConceptScheme when SPARQL endpoints contains more than one. #488
Comments
This is a good use case for #503 and is similar to netwerk-digitaal-erfgoed/requirements-datasets#46. A more standard way to provide multiple datasets from a single SPARQL endpoint is to use named graphs, which is expressible in SPARQL Service Descriptions. @wmelder Are you already using named graphs? If not, what is the reason to use |
We could generalise this by providing the dataset IRI as a SPARQL query parameter. As long as that matches the |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.5 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.6.7 🎉 The release is available on npm package (@latest dist-tag) Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.49.5 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.1.0 🎉 The release is available on npm package (@latest dist-tag) Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.1.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Some thesauri, like the GTAA, are partitioned using the skos ConceptScheme as categories. When the data for multiple ConceptSchemes is all in the same SPARQL endpoint, it is necessary to specify separate queries for every single ConceptScheme. The main difference in the queries is the object of the skos:inScheme property of the skos:Concepts, being the ConceptScheme itself. It would be beneficial if the skos:ConceptScheme somehow could be seen as a variable for a query, just like the search term is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: