Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Public Comment: 243 (Margaud Dieffenbacher) #243

Open
ncx-gitbot opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Public Comment: 243 (Margaud Dieffenbacher) #243

ncx-gitbot opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ncx-gitbot
Copy link
Contributor

Commenter Organization: La Belle Forêt

Commenter: Margaud Dieffenbacher

2021 Deferred Harvest Methodology Section: No Section Indicated

Comment: If an owner chooses to engage his forest in this method, is there a maximum period of enrollment ? Because, if he agrees to defer harvests for 10 or more years, isn't there a problem for natural regeneration ? If the stand is too thick, the quantity of lignt reaching the floor might not be enough for young seedlings. Can he still do some harvests if the withdrawn volume is less than what he could cut ? How does it work in that scenario ?

Proposed Change: No Proposed Change

@ncx-gitbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

NCX response: At this time there is no limit on the period of enrollment and a new baseline would be developed every year to accurately assess the total carbon at risk. However, we do recognize that natural regeneration impacts should be an area of future research.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant