We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would this be possible? Writing
{ arr contains _ }
as an anonymous function just looks a lot more readable than:
{ p => arr exists { _ == p } }
What do you think?
Using such an anonymous function in a filterNot is quite handy the absence of support for diff on arrays.
filterNot
diff
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @andrewdbate,
Definitely sounds like a good idea, thanks for the suggestion!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Would this be possible? Writing
as an anonymous function just looks a lot more readable than:
What do you think?
Using such an anonymous function in a
filterNot
is quite handy the absence of support fordiff
on arrays.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: