You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@article{black1996robust,
title={The robust estimation of multiple motions: Parametric and piecewise-smooth flow fields},
author={Black, Michael J and Anandan, Paul},
journal={Computer vision and image understanding},
volume={63},
number={1},
pages={75--104},
year={1996},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
Zhang 1997 presents parameters estimation from noisy data, including robust techniques
such as M-estimators and least median of squares (but not Ransac!).
@article{zhang1997parameter,
title={Parameter estimation techniques: A tutorial with application to conic fitting},
author={Zhang, Zhengyou},
journal={Image and vision Computing},
volume={15},
number={1},
pages={59--76},
year={1997},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
Stewart 1999 presents usage of M-estimators and least median squares (LMS)
and RANSAC in the context of computer vision.
@article{stewart1999robust,
title={Robust parameter estimation in computer vision},
author={Stewart, Charles V},
journal={SIAM review},
volume={41},
number={3},
pages={513--537},
year={1999},
publisher={SIAM}
}
In part 2 of Baker 2003, the authors show how a robust M-estimator can be used
within an inverse compositional iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) algorithm
@inproceedings{baker2003lucas,
title={Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework: Part 2},
author={Baker, Simon and Gross, Ralph and Ishikawa, Takahiro and Matthews, Iain},
booktitle={International Journal of Computer Vision},
year={2003},
organization={Citeseer}
}
In Audras 2011, the authors use a robust M-estimator
@inproceedings{audras2011real,
title={Real-time dense appearance-based SLAM for RGB-D sensors},
author={Audras, Cedric and Comport, A and Meilland, Maxime and Rives, Patrick},
booktitle={Australasian Conf. on Robotics and Automation},
volume={2},
pages={2--2},
year={2011}
}
Klose 2013 uses robust M-estimator Huber and Tukey.
Removes median abs res, and estimate std before computing weights.
Also introduce global affine illumination changes.
@inproceedings{klose2013efficient,
title={Efficient compositional approaches for real-time robust direct visual odometry from RGB-D data},
author={Klose, Sebastian and Heise, Philipp and Knoll, Alois},
booktitle={2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems},
pages={1100--1106},
year={2013},
organization={IEEE}
}
In Kerl 2013, they use a t-distribution instead of M-estimator.
@inproceedings{kerl2013robust,
title={Robust odometry estimation for RGB-D cameras},
author={Kerl, Christian and Sturm, J{\"u}rgen and Cremers, Daniel},
booktitle={2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation},
pages={3748--3754},
year={2013},
organization={IEEE}
}
Gutierrez 2015 evaluate huber, tukey and Student t-distribution. Find that t-dist is best and more stable.
@inproceedings{gutierrez2015inverse,
title={Inverse depth for accurate photometric and geometric error minimisation in RGB-D dense visual odometry},
author={Guti{\'e}rrez-G{\'o}mez, Daniel and Mayol-Cuevas, Walterio and Guerrero, Josechu J},
booktitle={2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},
pages={83--89},
year={2015},
organization={IEEE}
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Black 1996 uses Geman-McClure robust M-estimator.
Zhang 1997 presents parameters estimation from noisy data, including robust techniques
such as M-estimators and least median of squares (but not Ransac!).
Stewart 1999 presents usage of M-estimators and least median squares (LMS)
and RANSAC in the context of computer vision.
In part 2 of Baker 2003, the authors show how a robust M-estimator can be used
within an inverse compositional iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) algorithm
In Audras 2011, the authors use a robust M-estimator
Klose 2013 uses robust M-estimator Huber and Tukey.
Removes median abs res, and estimate std before computing weights.
Also introduce global affine illumination changes.
In Kerl 2013, they use a t-distribution instead of M-estimator.
@inproceedings{kerl2013robust, title={Robust odometry estimation for RGB-D cameras}, author={Kerl, Christian and Sturm, J{\"u}rgen and Cremers, Daniel}, booktitle={2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation}, pages={3748--3754}, year={2013}, organization={IEEE} }
Gutierrez 2015 evaluate huber, tukey and Student t-distribution. Find that t-dist is best and more stable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: