Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need better unit-test coverage #198

Open
ryan-collingham opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Need better unit-test coverage #198

ryan-collingham opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@ryan-collingham
Copy link
Contributor

We have good coverage with our functional tests but our unit-testing is currently better in some areas than others. Ideally we should aim for as close to 100% code coverage as reasonably possible with unit tests alone, with a unit test corresponding to every non-trivial testplan module.
@ryan-collingham ryan-collingham added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels May 30, 2019
@ryan-collingham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Our current code coverage for unit tests is 57% as measured by pytest-cov.

@ryan-collingham
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm only considering python code for this issue, not JS code for the web UI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ryan-collingham