-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OMIM 105210 mapping in Mondo #7598
Comments
Dear @kanems, We have received your ticket and will review it as soon as possible. If you have any additional information or updates relevant to your inquiry, please add them in a comment on this ticket. Your input is valuable in helping us understand and resolve the issue effectively. Thank you for your patience and for your contributions to Mondo! Sincerely, |
Closes #7598 MONDO:0971004 - OMIM:105210 definition matches correctly - *MEDGEN:414031 definition matches correctly, assigned MONDO:0100552 - Orphanet:85447 definition matches correctly MONDO:0007100 - DOID:0050638 definition matches correctly - EFO:0004129 definition matches correctly - *MEDGEN:414031 definition does not match correctly, should be assigned to MONDO:0971004 - MESH:C567782 definition matches correctly - NCIT:C84554 definition matches correctly - OMIMPS:105210 does not exist, is removed - Orphanet:271861 definition matches correctly - Orphanet:271861 source OMIM:105210 does not match correctly. This source is removed - Orphanet:85451 does not match correctly. This source is removed - SCTID:42295001 matches correctly
Hi @kanems After further review of the issue, we found that "Hereditary Systemic Amyloidosis 1" results from defects in the TTR gene, while ATTRV30M and ATTRV122I result from specific variations in the TTR gene. We updated the cross-references accordingly:
Based on this analysis, it looks like MEDGEN:414031 represents the concept of Hereditary Systemic Amyloidosis caused by a variation in the TTR gene, ie MONDO:0971004 (Hereditary Systemic Amyloidosis 1). If you agree, please make sure to update your mappings so it is reflected in the ontology. Thank you! Please let us know if you agree/disagree with our analysis, and if you have any comments |
I agree with this mapping/concept review. I will check our records to ensure we have correct/updated Mondo , OMIM and Orpha mappings to the best CUI in UMLS (if an appropriate one exists) for these concepts. |
Mondo term (ID and Label):
MONDO:0100552 ATTRV30M amyloidosis
MONDO:0007100 familial amyloid neuropathy (current Equivalent mapping in Mondo)
Xref that should be fixed (ID and label):
OMIM 105210
Your nano-attribution (ORCID)
If you don't have an ORCID, you can sign up for one here
Other comments:
I am not sure where this OMIM record belongs, but based on ORDO, http://www.orpha.net/ORDO/Orphanet_85447 is exact match to OMIM:105210. the parent concept (Orphanet:271861 Hereditary ATTR amyloidosis == MONDO:0007100) points to the MIM record, but the ORDO data for this same Orphanet record does not say they are an exact match.
Or is the overall OMIM record a match to the parent concept and then the 'included' concepts are the specific variants (V30M, V220I in Orphanet) that affect different organ systems (LEPTOMENINGEAL, CARDIOMYOPATHY , per OMIM) ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: