-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
erythrokeratoderma variabilis (et) progressivaMONDO:0017681 or MONDO:0017851 [Merge] #6534
Milestone
Comments
@kanems thanks for the ticket! We'll look into this asap. |
nicolevasilevsky
added
the
on list
Added to the obosletion or merge candidate list.
label
Aug 22, 2023
@sabrinatoro I added this to the list but this will need further review before merging. |
I agree that these seem like the same disease. I'll proceed with the merge and assign @sabrinatoro to review. |
nicolevasilevsky
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
sabrinatoro
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
* merge erythrokeratoderma variabilis progressiva close #6534 * fix obs reason * revise syns
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress
to Done
in 2024-03 Mondo Release
Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Mondo term (ID and Label)
erythrokeratoderma variabilis progressiva MONDO:0017681
Reason for deprecation
I am struggling to understand how this is clinically distinct from MONDO:0017851 erythrokeratodermia variabilis which includes the same abbreviation "EKVP" as the other record.
The OrphaNet term https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?Lng=EN&Expert=308166 describes at least some of the same causative genes as outlined on the OMIM PS https://www.omim.org/phenotypicSeries/PS133200 the 'expert' summary in Ordo shows it hasn't been updated since 2015, so it's possible that they are the same concept?
Term to be merged with
MONDO:0017851 erythrokeratodermia variabilis
Your nano-attribution (ORCID)
If you don't have an ORCID, you can sign up for one here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: