Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incoming ActivityPub objects with too long summary are rejected completely #15252

Open
1 task
Menrath opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 task
Labels
⚠️bug? This might be a bug 🌌Federation The Federation/ActivityPub feature packages/backend Server side specific issue/PR ❓needs more investigation A bug whose causes are unknown

Comments

@Menrath
Copy link

Menrath commented Jan 10, 2025

💡 Summary

When an incoming object contains a summary that is too long it is not processed successfully.

🥰 Expected Behavior

An object with a summary that is too long, the summary maybe just just get truncated, but not marked as invalid.

🤬 Actual Behavior

The object is not received successfully.

📝 Steps to Reproduce

No response

💻 Frontend Environment

* Model and OS of the device(s):
* Browser:
* Server URL:
* Misskey:

🛰 Backend Environment (for server admin)

* Installation Method or Hosting Service:
* Misskey:
* Node:
* PostgreSQL:
* Redis:
* OS and Architecture:

Do you want to address this bug yourself?

  • Yes, I will patch the bug myself and send a pull request
@KisaragiEffective
Copy link
Collaborator

Could you provide the payload? It will help to move this forward.

@KisaragiEffective KisaragiEffective added packages/backend Server side specific issue/PR 🌌Federation The Federation/ActivityPub feature ❓needs more investigation A bug whose causes are unknown labels Jan 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚠️bug? This might be a bug 🌌Federation The Federation/ActivityPub feature packages/backend Server side specific issue/PR ❓needs more investigation A bug whose causes are unknown
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants