[Enhancement]: Support find0 in bitset operation #39124
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement
Issues or changes related to enhancement
Comments
sre-ci-robot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2025
…39176) issue: #39124 `bitset::find_first()` and `bitset::find_next()` now accept one more parameter, which allows to search for `0` bit instead of `1` bit Signed-off-by: Alexandr Guzhva <[email protected]>
congqixia
pushed a commit
to congqixia/milvus
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2025
…ilvus-io#39176) issue: milvus-io#39124 `bitset::find_first()` and `bitset::find_next()` now accept one more parameter, which allows to search for `0` bit instead of `1` bit Signed-off-by: Alexandr Guzhva <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Congqi Xia <[email protected]>
sre-ci-robot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2025
…nd 1 (#39237) Cherry-pick from master pr: #39176 #39229 issue: #39124 `bitset::find_first()` and `bitset::find_next()` now accept one more parameter, which allows to search for `0` bit instead of `1` bit --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandr Guzhva <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Congqi Xia <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Guzhva <[email protected]>
gifi-siby
pushed a commit
to gifi-siby/milvus
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2025
…ilvus-io#39176) issue: milvus-io#39124 `bitset::find_first()` and `bitset::find_next()` now accept one more parameter, which allows to search for `0` bit instead of `1` bit Signed-off-by: Alexandr Guzhva <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is there an existing issue for this?
What would you like to be added?
Support
find0operation in bitset to avoidflipoperation when milvus want to find 0 instead of 1Why is this needed?
flipping a bitset could be too heavy for retrieving operation
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: