Different numbers of clones in previous mixcr version (3) and new version (4.1.2) #994
-
Hello! We are trying to launch a new version of mixcr on the same data that we had calculated on version 3. We are using this tutorial and have a few question:
Thank you for your answering! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Hi, The tutorial might be slightly outdated, I apologize for that, I'll fix it. Also, to answer the question about tcr and bcr data analysis. In all cases MiXCR tries to align reads against both TCR and BCR references. However, we have different aligners for BCR data, which suits it better. TCR aligner is not tuned to work with BCR data, but it's faster, BCR aligner works with both TCR and BCR, but it is more time consuming. Regardless of the aligner you will get both TCR and BCR clones, unless specified otherwise on the export step. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are few reasons why you might get different results:
To reproduce similar behavior you want to use the following preset:
So you will get something like:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
There are few reasons why you might get different results:
--write-alignments
on assemble and-p fullImputed
on export. Does that mean that you are trying to reconstruct the full-length receptor sequence (not just CDR3 region)? If that's the case I think you also usedmixcr assembleContigs
step for MiXCR v3 (the one that uses the alignments you preserve with--write-alignments
on assemble step to reconstruct the full length sequence).To reproduce similar behavior you want to use the following preset:
rnaseq-full-length
.-ObadQualityThreshold=10
for MiXCR v3 and in MiXCR v4 this parameter is set to 20 for the RNA-Seq preset.You can try adding the following param…