Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question // potential transformations // Image Statistics Matching #228

Open
aabramovrepo opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@aabramovrepo
Copy link

Dear All,

first of all, thanks for making this project available, some great work here! Together with my colleagues I have been working over the last year on unsupervised Domain Adaptation (DA) for object detection. In our work a DA problem for object detection was tackled from a new perspective: we solely matched image statistics between source and target domains without involving additional architectural add-ons and hyper-parameters. Thus, a detection model and training schedule stay as they are and you get state-of-the-art performance in the presence of a domain shift. For matching we used two operations: Feature Distribution Matching and Histogram Matching, you can find further details along with all experiments in our paper for CVPR'20 workshop:

Keep it Simple: Image Statistics Matching for Domain Adaptation.

From my point of view, both methods can be used for data augmentation as well, however, they require images from target distribution (or similar ones). I'm just wondering whether this might be of interest for Augmentor, so it would be great to hear your opinion on this. Here is the link to our repository with both methods: image-statistics-matching

Best,
Alexey

@mdbloice
Copy link
Owner

mdbloice commented Jan 7, 2021

Hi,
Thanks for reaching out! I had a look at the two techniques you mentioned, could they be applied in an automated manner? For example, for the Feature Distribution Matching and Histogram Matching described in the GitHub repo's README.md I saw you need to supply a source image and a reference image: do these need to be individually defined in order for the techniques to be useful? Could they use image labels for example?

Anyway, yes, I think they would make useful additions to the library if they can be integrated, which I would happily do if that is the case :-)

M.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants