Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate sampling options for 240p/288p #85

Open
filevans opened this issue Jun 20, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Separate sampling options for 240p/288p #85

filevans opened this issue Jun 20, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@filevans
Copy link

Hello please could you make these use different settings as at the moment they're grouped into the same sampling options and I use different ones for both. I use x2 for 240p and X3 for 288p with different vertical backporch and vertical pixel settings too. 240p is around 60hz and 288p is around 50hz so they should be able to be separated so a separate profile isn't required for each one. Thanks for listening

@mistepien
Copy link

I fully concur. New tv boxes are more and more picky in relation for resolution. I have free-region modded SNES and the only option for NTSC and PAL working for me is 3x with "Generic 4:3". Everything else may work for PAL but not for NTSC (or vice versa). I mean tv says "resolution unknown" or I got wrong proportions. Thus different setting for 240p (NTSC) and 288p (PAL). Would be great. This way I would be able to have 5x for NTSC (240p) and 3x for PAL (288p).

@marqs85
Copy link
Owner

marqs85 commented Feb 16, 2022

Sampling presets are already separate for 240p and 288p so I suppose you mean splitting "240p/288p proc" into two? It is like that on OSSC Pro, I can consider this for the Classic model too.

@mistepien
Copy link

Yes, of course but for instance I would be able to use 5x with dejiter in NTSC and 3x with PAL -- that is SNES and it would work very nice. I'm looking forward to have it in my 1.6v OSSC. Once again -- what you are doing is just priceless for retro-community.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants