We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the following patch helped a lot in smoothing the graphs on network bursts:
- "--slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 -l 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " . + "--logarithmic --slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " .
- "--slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 -l 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " .
+ "--logarithmic --slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " .
it may be nice to have this as an option in the config file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
while this is great for the spikes issue, we loose the negative display.
There is this an interesting blog about using trends to fight the spike issue.
I've also bumped into this: negative logarithms
an example of the issue and the same graph with logarithmic scale.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
the following patch helped a lot in smoothing the graphs on network bursts:
- "--slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 -l 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " .
+ "--logarithmic --slope-mode --alt-autoscale -u 0 --imgformat=PNG --base=1000 --height=$height --width=$width " .
it may be nice to have this as an option in the config file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: