You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to use CLASS to follow the evolution of delta_cdm at very high k and I have stumbled into a weird issue.
Basically, for k=5e3, I found that setting start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k = 0.007 and curvature_ini = 1.00001, leads to a 35% of the value of delta_cdm today compared to the default setting start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k = 0.05 and curvature_ini = 1. This 35% change is inconsistent with the subtle change in the initial conditions. See figure below:
Playing around I noticed that this spurious and inconsistent enhancement of delta_cdm is presented, although with different magnitudes, for basically any value of start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k < 0.05. When using the default value, I get at a 1e-5 change in delta_cdm consistent with curvature_ini = 1.00001, see figure below:
It looks like this funny behavior starts around the TCA (see the vertical dashed lines in the plots), but I do not have an intuition of why changing start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k will mess up with the TCA approximation. I'm using CLASS v3.2.0 (although I've found the same problem with v2.6.3) and in both cases I've set P_k_max_h/Mpc = 1e4. I've found similar results for k=5e2.
Do you have an idea of what would causing this issue? Perhaps I need to tune other precision params?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use CLASS to follow the evolution of delta_cdm at very high k and I have stumbled into a weird issue.
Basically, for k=5e3, I found that setting
start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k = 0.007
andcurvature_ini = 1.00001
, leads to a 35% of the value of delta_cdm today compared to the default settingstart_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k = 0.05
andcurvature_ini = 1
. This 35% change is inconsistent with the subtle change in the initial conditions. See figure below:Playing around I noticed that this spurious and inconsistent enhancement of delta_cdm is presented, although with different magnitudes, for basically any value of
start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k
< 0.05. When using the default value, I get at a 1e-5 change in delta_cdm consistent withcurvature_ini = 1.00001
, see figure below:It looks like this funny behavior starts around the TCA (see the vertical dashed lines in the plots), but I do not have an intuition of why changing
start_large_k_at_tau_h_over_tau_k
will mess up with the TCA approximation. I'm using CLASS v3.2.0 (although I've found the same problem with v2.6.3) and in both cases I've set P_k_max_h/Mpc = 1e4. I've found similar results for k=5e2.Do you have an idea of what would causing this issue? Perhaps I need to tune other precision params?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: