Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SRFI 143 specification of fxif #814

Open
WillClinger opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

SRFI 143 specification of fxif #814

WillClinger opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
C: SRFIs P: trivial T: correctness
Milestone
Larceny 1.5

Comments

@WillClinger
Copy link
Member

The SRFI 143 specification of fxif is incompatible with R6RS fxif and bitwise-if, but that may be an error in SRFI 143. The GitHub repository for SRFI 143 currently contains tests that assume fxif is compatible with the R6RS.

This was reported on the SRFI 143 mailing list almost two months ago, but there has been no response:

https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-143/msg/5855757

I'm giving this a v1.5 milestone just so we'll be reminded to check whether there has been any resolution of the matter.
@WillClinger WillClinger added this to the Larceny 1.5 milestone Jul 27, 2017
@johnwcowan
Copy link

I have sent an erratum to the SRFI 143 mailing list and requested srfi-editors@ to fix it, along with the error in the R6RS version of fxbit-field-rotate pointed out by Peter Lane.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C: SRFIs P: trivial T: correctness
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Larceny 1.5
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@johnwcowan @WillClinger