Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable customization of securityContext for containers #1675

Open
andrewmyhre opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Enable customization of securityContext for containers #1675

andrewmyhre opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@andrewmyhre
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like
The webhook containers currently require privilege escalation to execute. In our organization Kubernetes clusters strictly enforce security context to disallow privilege escalation without sufficient justification. We have been maintaining our own fork of this Helm chart with the following amendment to the upgrade webhook job manifests:

spec:
  template:
    spec:
        containers:
        - name: crds-upgrade # same for crds-keep
          securityContext:
            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false

The webhooks are able to operate without privilege escalation enabled. We don't want to maintain our own fork of the Helm chart, we would prefer that the securityContext for these containers is able to be configured via the values.yaml file.

Anything else you would like to add:

Environment:

  • Secrets Store CSI Driver version: (use the image tag): v1.4.6
  • Kubernetes version: (use kubectl version):
@andrewmyhre andrewmyhre added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Oct 25, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants