You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much for making this amazing software possible! I think there might be a small bug regarding reading the INFO field when the gene annotations field including CDS are mixed up with the DS field.
For example a dummy INFO field contains AN=100;SIFTINFO=T|TRANSCRIPT|GENE|NA|CDS|SYNONYMOUS|S/S|60|0.52|3.44|840|novel|TOLERATED;SOR=1.199;VariantType=SNP then it would be classifed as DS==TRUE despite that the DS; field is not actually presenting in the derived vcfR object.
Thank you for looking into it again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @meixilin , thanks for your post. But I'm afraid I don't understand your issue well enough to address it. Let's see if we can create a reproducible example to. That way I ma be able to reproduce the issue and hopefully address it. Thanks!
Brian
Hi,
Thank you so much for making this amazing software possible! I think there might be a small bug regarding reading the
INFO
field when the gene annotations field includingCDS
are mixed up with theDS
field.For example a dummy INFO field contains
AN=100;SIFTINFO=T|TRANSCRIPT|GENE|NA|CDS|SYNONYMOUS|S/S|60|0.52|3.44|840|novel|TOLERATED;SOR=1.199;VariantType=SNP
then it would be classifed asDS==TRUE
despite that theDS;
field is not actually presenting in the derivedvcfR
object.Thank you for looking into it again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: