You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The IaaS-Server section appears to have an overwhelming amount of content, making it difficult to navigate. There is a need to improve this as follows. It is challenging to accurately compare specifications. I have only displayed the CPU generation and GPU, but I would like to compare a broader range of hardware specs. However, this does not seem to fit the format of an awesome list. For example, it can be presented in a table format like below:
CSP
Size
Physical CPU cores
Processor
Memory (GB)
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)
Base CPU frequency (GHz)
Single-core frequency (GHz, peak)
RDMA performance (Gb/s)
MPI support
Temp storage (TB)
Max data disks
Max Ethernet vNICs
Azure
Standard_HB176rs_v4
176
AMD EPYC 9V33X (Genoa-X)
768
780
2.4
3.7
400
All
2 * 1.8
32
8
Furthermore, instead of displaying all instances, it seems necessary to only show the latest instances. However, I need to contemplate on a rule to define what is considered 'latest'."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The IaaS-Server section appears to have an overwhelming amount of content, making it difficult to navigate. There is a need to improve this as follows. It is challenging to accurately compare specifications. I have only displayed the CPU generation and GPU, but I would like to compare a broader range of hardware specs. However, this does not seem to fit the format of an awesome list. For example, it can be presented in a table format like below:
Furthermore, instead of displaying all instances, it seems necessary to only show the latest instances. However, I need to contemplate on a rule to define what is considered 'latest'."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: