Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Correctly flatten lambdas passed to lesser arity functions #28

Open
kjnilsson opened this issue Dec 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Correctly flatten lambdas passed to lesser arity functions #28

kjnilsson opened this issue Dec 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@kjnilsson
Labels
0.1.0 bug

Comments

@kjnilsson
Copy link
Owner

Consider a function: f int -> int -> int being passed as a higher order function requiring fewer arguments. This fails as we flatten the lambda into a function with the same arity. Can we inspect the required type and only flatten "as much as needed"?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kjnilsson kjnilsson

Labels
0.1.0 bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kjnilsson