Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Parsing of $GITHUB_OUTPUT variables #66

Open
im-sampm opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #67
Open

Parsing of $GITHUB_OUTPUT variables #66

im-sampm opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #67

Comments

@im-sampm
Copy link
Contributor

im-sampm commented Jan 5, 2024

Feature request
I have workflows that pass their outputs via $GITHUB_OUTPUT.

For example:

[test-add-assignee-to-issue/add-assignee-to-issue]   ✅  Success - Main Test
[test-add-assignee-to-issue/add-assignee-to-issue]   ⚙  ::set-output:: ORG_NAME=automated-test-org
[test-add-assignee-to-issue/add-assignee-to-issue]   ⚙  ::set-output:: REPO_NAME=assignee-repo
[test-add-assignee-to-issue/add-assignee-to-issue]   ⚙  ::set-output:: ISSUE_ASSIGNEES=user1,user2
[test-add-assignee-to-issue/add-assignee-to-issue]   ⚙  ::set-output:: HOSTNAME=github.com

It would be nice if these outputs could be parsed and packaged so they can more easily integrate with a test runner.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
@im-sampm
Copy link
Contributor Author

im-sampm commented Jan 5, 2024

Related question, how does the "Start Group" / "End Group" functionality work?

@im-sampm
Copy link
Contributor Author

im-sampm commented Jan 5, 2024

To answer my own question, I found this test which illustrates how to use groups: https://github.com/kiegroup/act-js/blob/main/test/it/resources/group.yml

@im-sampm im-sampm linked a pull request Jan 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
@shubhbapna
Copy link
Collaborator

Ping me if you have any further questions

@TWiStErRob
Copy link
Contributor

Would this be solved by #70 ?

@TWiStErRob TWiStErRob mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2024
Open
@TWiStErRob TWiStErRob mentioned this issue Feb 29, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Added support for parsing github-output vars im-sampm/act-js
3 participants
@TWiStErRob @shubhbapna @im-sampm