Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: incorrect type for Flat Config #3867

Closed
2 tasks done
renchris opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done

[Bug]: incorrect type for Flat Config #3867

renchris opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@renchris
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and my issue is unique
  • My issue appears in the command-line and not only in the text editor

Description Overview

The eslint-config-airbnb plugin does not have the correct type for the Flat Config whether it be using the tselint config helper from typescript-eslint or using the Linter type from eslint

import reactPlugin from "eslint-plugin-react";
import tseslint from 'typescript-eslint';
import { type Linter } from "eslint";

const reactConfigRecommended = reactPlugin.configs.flat!.recommended

const tsEslintConfig = tseslint.config(
    reactConfigRecommended,
);
// error: Argument of type ReactFlagConfig is not assignable to parameter of type InfiniteDepthConfigWithExtends

const linterConfig: Linter.Config[] = [
    reactConfigRecommended,
}];
// error: Type ReactFlagConfig is not assignable to type Config<RulesRecord>

### Expected Behavior

I would expect there not to be a type conflict error.

### eslint-plugin-react version

7.37.2

### eslint version

8.57.1

### node version

18.20.3
@renchris renchris added the bug label Dec 12, 2024
@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Dec 12, 2024

I believe this will be fixed by #3840, which makes this a duplicate of #3838.

@ljharb ljharb closed this as completed Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants